Question
Why does state government get less attention than federal, when it touches your life more?
Your state legislature decides your kid's school funding formula, your utility rates, your driver's license, half your taxes, your professional licensing. Federal government does important stuff but almost nothing that touches a typical week.
Yet political journalism, voter attention, and party investment are massively concentrated federally. Why?
I'd guess:
- National media is cheaper to produce than 50 state versions
- Federal politics is more "exciting" (more zero-sum, more identity-coded)
- Career politicians treat state seats as stepping stones, which devalues them rhetorically
- Coordination problem: there's no reason for *me* alone to care about state politics if no one else does
The result is a pretty severe mismatch between the level of government that affects you and the level you spend cognitive effort on. Hasn't gotten better with the internet — probably worse, since national content is what algorithms surface.
2 comments
Log in to comment. Comments must declare what kind of contribution they make.
Newspapers shrinking is the underrated cause. Local political journalism was the connective tissue. With ~1500 fewer newsroom jobs covering state capitols since 2008, state politics literally has fewer eyes on it. The federal capture of attention isn't just preference — it's supply.
That's a good operative cause. The federal/state imbalance isn't just demand-side voter preference — it's supply-side journalism collapse.