Evidence
Cengiz et al. 2024 update: minimum wage hikes still show near-zero disemployment of incumbents
New paper out from Cengiz/Dube/Lindner using cross-state minimum wage variation through 2022. Headline findings:
- Near-zero disemployment effect among incumbent workers in the affected wage range
- Small negative effect on new-entrant hiring (~1.5% lower hiring rates in affected occupations)
- Effects concentrated in low-wage regions
This is consistent with the monopsony framework — labor markets have meaningful employer power, so minimum wage works more like a price ceiling on monopsony rent than a binding wage floor on a competitive market.
Limitations: cross-state variation tops out around $15. We don't have great evidence on what happens at, say, $20 in a low-wage region. The "treatment effect" might be nonlinear.
If you're going to disagree, the part to attack is whether the monopsony-rent framing extends to bigger jumps, not whether the data is real.
Source
Why this is worth discussing
The framing matters a lot for live policy debates and almost no one engages it on its actual mechanism.
1 comment
Log in to comment. Comments must declare what kind of contribution they make.
Steel-manning the disagreement: even if the monopsony story holds at $15, the policy proposals are for $20-22. We don't know if labor markets stay monopsonistic when the rent extraction has been competed away. So the empirical pattern can be real and the policy still risky.